Saturday, December 19, 2015

The Big Short & Xmas: The Movie & Democracy!

Merry Christmas!

Finland ©2012 Am Ang Zhang
 The Big Short  movie is out! 
Most Americans probably hadn’t heard the phrase “mortgage-backed securities” until around 2008, when the subprime-mortgage crisis erupted and sent the U.S. financial system into chaos.

But what exactly happened? That’s the central question of the film The Big Short, an adaptation of Michael Lewis’s 2010 book about a handful of Wall Streeters who uncovered the underlying problems in the mortgage market and bet against (or shorted) the securities made up of subprime debt before all hell broke loose. These underdogs become the winners of the financial crisis. Kind of.

The Big Short is immensely entertaining. The movie makes a serious effort to capture some of the more outlandish Wall Street personas: The socially awkward genius, Michael Burry (Christian Bale); the crank, Mark Baum (Steve Carell); the slimy wanna-be millionaire, Jared Vennett (Ryan Gosling); and the recovering ex financier, Ben Rickert (Brad Pitt). And to put some (likely overemphasized) heart and morality into the story, there is a focus on the dismay of these characters (Carell in particular) as they realize how dire the circumstances they are profiting off of really are.

………..  Let’s skip to the end, when they crash the American Securitization Forum in Las Vegas. I quite liked that part of the film, these renegades going on a truth-seeking trip to see if their “big short” bets would pay off. I also thought the twist in the story was well-done: When their bets aren’t paying off on the timeline they expected, they never suspected that the ratings agencies had misaligned incentives to give unduly high ratings to mortgage backed securities. Did you feel stressed out watching that part of the film? I know I did. Actually, I think watching this reenactment of the financial crisis was stressful in general. I was laughing at the jokes with clenched fists.


Vanity Fair

Michael Lewis:
To my surprise these peculiar people proved willing to tell me their stories. But when I set out to retell them I ran into a couple of problems. One was the sheer complexity of modern finance: how to explain credit-default swaps and collateralized debt obligations to my mother? I’m actually not sure that my mother ever read The Big Short—she prefers mysteries—but she has always been my standard: if my mother can’t understand what I’m saying, there’s no point in saying it. The second, related problem was how to get my mother to wantto understand credit-default swaps and collateralized debt obligations. It’s never enough to explain complicated things to a reader; the reader needs first to want to know about them. If the thing is seriously complicated, the reader must very badly want to know about it. My job, as I saw it, was to make the reader badly want to know about credit-default swaps and collateralized debt obligations. The marvelous characters who had foreseen the collapse of the financial system became the solution to both my problems. My reader (so I hoped) would feel it was worth trying to understand credit-default swaps because these enthralling characters were also trying to understand them.



From the Archives:

Aug 6, 2010

History & Democracy : Liar’s Poker & The Big Short

Michael Lewis wrote a book called “Liar’s Poker” twenty years ago. It was at the time an eye opener for me and I enjoyed it tremendously.

Lewis thought he was writing a furious anti-money book and hoped that those that read it would avoid Wall Street. Instead he inspired many to join the amoral world of finance and many even wrote to thank him.

We spent millions telling kids not to take drugs; they do.
We spent millions on sex education; more teenage girls get pregnant.

I remember one of his quotes in Liar’s Poker:

The only thing that history teaches us, a wise man once said, is that history doesn’t teach us anything.---

I saw his new book The Big Short when I was on holiday recently and decided to have a look.
Copyright @ W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 2010

Two things I noticed, there was something about a bank from where I grew up and there was a Doctor with Asperger’s Syndrome that made over $700 million from the recent Wall Street meltdown.  Vanity Fair

It proved to be as good a read as Liar’s Poker and in many ways better.

As Washington Post put it:

What's so delightful about Lewis's writing is how deftly he explains and demystifies how things really work on Wall Street, even while creating a compelling narrative and introducing us to a cast of fascinating, all-too-human characters.

A few things I picked out from the book The Big Short.

On Wall Street:

"Wall Street is able to delude itself because it's paid to delude itself. I mean one of the lessons of this story is that people see what they're incentivized to see. If you pay someone not to see the truth, they will not see the truth. And, Wall Street organized itself so people were paid to see something other than the truth. And that's one of the central messages of this story. You have to be very careful how you incentivize people, 'cause they will respond to the incentives."

The big Wall Street firms, seemingly so shrewd and self-interested, had somehow become the dumb money. The people who ran them did not understand their own businesses, and their regulators obviously knew even less. Charlie and Jamie had always sort of assumed that there was some grown-up in charge of the financial system whom they had never met; now, they saw there was not. 


On Greenspan:
Steve Eisman (well known for his rudeness) on Greenspan: "I feel sorry for him because he’s a guy who is really smart who was basically wrong about everything."

On Goldman Sachs and AIG
Wall Street's most influential investment bank convinced the financial products division of insurance giant AIG insurance to join the party, a decision that would destroy the company. 
"They insured tens of billions of dollars of subprime mortgage loans without even knowing they were doing it," Lewis said. "Goldman Sachs persuaded them to insure these piles of loans without them ever investigating what was in the pile. So, there's an additional level of incompetence. They didn't even know the mistake they were making." 

"Goldman essentially took the worst stuff that they couldn't sell. They repackaged it and took it to Moody's. And got Moody's to rate it AAA?" Lewis was asked. "How did they know that Moody's was gonna rate it AAA?" 

"Yes. They had helped design the models I'm sure that Moody's used to rate the bonds. And I've spoken with people at Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs who said, 'We helped the ratings agencies understand these things,'" Lewis said. 

On Morgan Stanley
"I mean, there's a wonderful little vignette in the 'Big Short' about the leading bond trade, subprime mortgage bond trader at Morgan Stanley, a fellow named Howie Hubler, who manages to lose somewhere between, it's hard to know, but seven and $12 billion in a matter of six or eight months, more than any single trader has ever lost in the history of Wall Street, and no one knows his name," Lewis said. 

Asked what happened to Hubler, Lewis said, "He's allowed to resign from Morgan Stanley and he takes with him tens of millions of dollars in back pay; it was all hushed up, basically." 

On Household
The year was now 2002. There were no public subprime lending companies left in America. There was, however, an ancient consumer lending giant called Household Finance Corporation. Created in the 1870s, it had long been a leader in the field. Eisman understood the company well, he thought, until he realized that he didn’t. In early 2002 he got his hands on Household’s new sales document offering home equity loans. The company’s CEO, Bill Aldinger, had grown Household even as his competitors went bankrupt. …….The borrower was told he had an “effective interest rate of 7 percent” when he was in fact paying something like 12.5 percent. “It was blatant fraud,” said Eisman. “They were tricking their customers.”

It didn’t take long for Eisman to find complaints from borrowers who had figured out what had just happened to them. …….Hundreds of people in and around Bellingham had picked up the newspaper to discover that their 7 percent mortgage was in fact a 12.5 percent mortgage.

He was incredulous to learn that the attorney general had investigated Household and then been prevented, by a state judge, from releasing the results of his investigation. Eisman obtained a copy; its contents confirmed his worst suspicions. “I would say to the guy in the attorney general’s office, ‘Why aren’t you arresting people?’ He’d say, ‘They’re a powerful company. If they’re gone, who would make subprime loans in the state of Washington?’ I said, ‘Believe me, there will be a train full of people coming to lend money.’”

The following year it sold itself, and its giant portfolio of subprime loans, for $15.5 billion to the British financial conglomerate the HSBC Group.

Eisman was genuinely shocked. “It never entered my mind that this could possibly happen,” he said. “This wasn’t just another company
—this was the biggest company by far making subprime loans. And it was engaged in just blatant fraud…….Instead they sold the company and the CEO made a hundred million dollars.

So I decided to Google the events around Household International.

The former executive chairman, Sir John Bondwho led the purchase of the Household lending business and is now chairman of Vodafone, took home £2m in salary and bonuses for just five months' work in 2006 but also received £6.6m of free shares linked to past performance.

Many of HSBC's current woes can be pinned on Sir John Bond, below, the bank's former chairman who in 2005 completed a £24bn spending spree with the £9bn purchase of US consumer finance firm Household International.

Bond hailed Household as a fitting swansong when he left the bank a few months later to chair Vodafone, where he remains. But many shareholders were upset by the £22m payout he sanctioned to the US lender's boss, and the multimillion-pound bonus he sanctioned for himself and other directors.

March 2, 2009

HSBC Holdings Plc, Europe’s biggest bank, is abandoning U.S. subprime lending six years after a $15.5 billion expansion that led to record loan losses.

“The board of HSBC has finally accepted that its catastrophic investment in Household International, not long ago described by the chief executive as a ‘dream portfolio,’ is worthless,” the U.S. fund manager said. “The investment has now been fully written off and the business is being shut down.”

Michael Lewis was right:

"All" of the people who made these terrible decisions left with a lot of money. "I didn't run across a single character who didn't get rich. Anybody above a certain level in all these firms made huge sums of money by any standard.

What is scary is a similar class action settlement of UnitedHealth:

January 15, 2009 
UnitedHealth Group Inc., the biggest U.S. health insurer, said it will spend $400 million to settle allegations it has manipulated payments to doctors and patients for the last 15 years.

I can only quote the book again:

I think there is something fundamentally scary about our democracy…. Because I think people have a sense that the system is rigged, and it’s hard to argue that it isn’t.


Book I recently read: superhero for grown ups! 
Flash Boys: Michael Lewis
Over the past week, a host of U.S. authorities have confirmed that they are looking into certain practices used by high-speed traders, whose strategies can involve executing thousands of trades in milliseconds. The FBI, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the U.S. Justice Department and the attorney-general of New York State all have investigations underway.
For Mr. Katsuyama, the probes are partial vindication. Several years ago, while working for Royal Bank of Canada in New York, he began to suspect something was amiss in the execution of stock trades – namely that high-speed traders were, in effect, getting a tiny sneak peek at his transactions before they could be completed.
RBC “was the perfect place to discover what we discovered,” he said. It was a firm where “choosing to do the right thing was not a hard decision.”
Mr. Katsuyama left RBC in 2012 and launched IEX’s stock trading platform last October. Its objective: creating a market where high-speed traders do not enjoy any advantages over their slower peers. For now, the IEX share of overall trading volume is minuscule, but it is growing; this week, the platform experienced its biggest day on record, with 58 million shares traded.
Sitting in a bare office overlooking the former site of the two World Trade Center towers, Mr. Katsuyama appeared slightly shell-shocked by his transformation into a semi-public figure and by the passionate responses to Flash Boys – both in support and in opposition.


Nov 19, 2015 ... Michael Lewis: The Big Short · BBC: ... So there's Jeremy newly installed as Health Secretary after just seven short years as an MP. This is a ...
cockroachcatcher.blogspot.com
Jun 28, 2015 ... History & Democracy : Liar's Poker & The Big Short · Iceland: Inside Job & The Ruling Class · The Cockroach Catcher: History & Democracy: ...
cockroachcatcher.blogspot.com

Jun 30, 2011 ... Michael Lewis: The Big Short ... paid big salaries regardless / or that they might go and work for the banks (that eventually failed) and MEPs and ...

No comments: