Most of
us do not realise how brilliant those people that have worked at Goldman Sachs
are:
Antigone managed to help Greece "relocate" their debt
before they entered the EU. In the business world, Antigone or Addy was highly regarded:
"A defiant
Goldman Sachs says it did nothing wrong by concocting a deal that temporarily
masked Greece's bloated government debt, an arrangement that has sparked
outrage across Europe."
Now Ali Parsa is from the same Goldman
Sachs stock and he is either altruistic or very smart & has done the
unthinkable of "buying" a failing NHS hospital. "Buying" is
perhaps wrong as he is smart and will not do anything like that. There were
little if any detail about the deal but knowing someone with a Goldman
background, the government would not be a match at all as far as the contract
goes. But then the government was not that good with ISTC or PFIs.
For Hinchingbrooks to succeed it must do
more cases and yet CCGs are suppose to cut referrals to hospitals. Ali Parsa
must know that and my assumption is that it will not happen with Hinchinbrooks.
Being private means we the public cannot access the details of the deal.
Another smart move then.
But perhaps they too were smart as it is
one means for the ruling class to secure their future and ration health care at
the same time. Sorry---getting GPs to ration Health Care
After all Greece still has more Porsche
per capita if you must know and most of their rulers' money are safe in
Switzerland.
To say the Circle is the John Lewis of
Health Care is indeed a blatant insult to that much loved high street store.
John Lewis had no Cayman connection and Circle is not fully 100% employee
co-owned.
But Circle is really a first step by our
government to COVERTLY ration HEALTH CARE. Canada is doing it using waiting
time and so are many western and indeed eastern countries.
The distraction of the current NHS Reform
is to allow the debate to be focused on Primary Care.
That has now changed thanks to
Circle.
Please everybody it is about Consultants &
Secondary CARE!!!
Most people in well paid jobs (including those at the GMC) have health
insurance. GPs have traditionally been gatekeepers and asked for specialist
help when needed. If we are honest about private insurance it is not about
Primary Care, that most of us have quick access to; it is about Specialist
Care, from IVF to Caesarian Section ( and there are no Nurse Specialists doing
that yet), from Appendectomy to Colonic Cancer treatment (and Bare Foot doctors
in the Mao era cannot do the latter either), from keyhole knee work for
Cricketers to full hip-replacements, from Stents to Heart Transplants, from
Anorexia Nervosa to Schizophrenia, from Trigeminal Neuralgia to Multifocal
Glioma, from prostate cancer to kidney transplant and I could go on and on.China realised
in 1986 you need well trained Specialists to do those. We do not seem to learn
from the mistakes of others.
When there are not enough specialists to go
round in any country money is used to ration care.
So we are going to but in a peculiar manner as
the NHS used to be state run and free. Reform is needed!!! Enter GP
commissioning. If it is your GP doing the rationing it is no longer the
State's problem.
According to the NAO:
In 2009 the total value of the market for
PH(Private Healthcare) in the UK was
estimated at just over £5.8 billion. Private hospitals and clinics account for
the largest part of the overall PH market, generating an estimated £3.75
billion in revenue during 2009. Fees to surgeons, anaesthetists and physicians
generated an estimated £1.6 billion in 2009.
The total number of UK citizens
with Private Insurance is estimated to be around 90,000. It is not difficult to
work out what good value the NHS has always been.
The NHS was not perfect, far from it and yet
successive attempts at fixing it has produce the opposite effect: it needs more
fixing.
If you read that line again from the NAO
report, it was clear where the problem was: fees to surgeons,
anaesthetists and physicians!!!
Yes, that was the main recipient of Private
Health income.
To become a Consultant in the NHS used to be
prestigious and even those aiming to doing mainly private work will have to
wait till they achieve Consultant status in the NHS.
The NHS for all its sins tried to keep every
consultant as close to the MAYO ideal by insisting on the same
pay-scale.
Several levels of Distinction Awards were used
to keep some professors and top consultants happy. Later the name of the Awards was
changed and yet it was still the same soup.
If Consultants were prepared to give up one
session of pay, then there is no limit as to the private work they can take on.
It was a safe way to start your private work and you keep the rather nice NHS
pension.
What is generally not talked about is that you
keep one foot in your NHS hospital and one in your private one.
So far so good and yet this is where the
problem starts.
It does not need a genius to work out that
people worry about their health and do not want to wait for a suspicious lump
to stay in their body too long. They will pay. We need not even mention the
manipulation of waiting lists, etc. Then big companies realise that they can
attract staff by offering Health Insurance and the rest is as they say history.
Then the rules changed and every consultant can
do a maximum of 10% of their NHS pay in private work without having to give up
anything. Some hospitals even allow you to use their facilities for a small fee.
Why not, more private patient means less
expenditure for the NHS.
Private Insurers discovered that too and they
started offering a small fee if you can wait for your operation at your free
NHS hospital.
There has never been any control of Health
Insurers and I suspect if was not even because they have a strong lobby: just
the feeling that the NHS was for everybody so no one could be excluded.
But Health Insurers are cleverer, they exclude chronic conditions, many psychiatric
ones belong to that group and often they will exclude after a while.
So, indeed it was a clever move by the present
government to simply hand over a portion of money to the GPs and say: get on
with it, the best price or better still, why not treat them yourself. You are
all doctors, forgetting one of their own just had neurosurgery done at Queen Square.
Until, now Consultants are to be excluded from
the consortia. Most are not making too much noise for a very good reason.
There just are not enough of us Consultants and
the reform is really COVERT rationing by any other name.
How else could the government continue to claim
that competition will improve standard and bring down cost.
Private or NHS, they are the same Surgeons,
Anesthetists and Physicians. Yes, the same consultants. Only in
Private Hospitals you may get free cappuccinos.
It is so simple: Private Providers need to make
a profit so there is going to be less money for patient care, not more.
NHS services in some parts of England could
be "destabilised" by private firms taking advantage ……….to win
contracts for patients with easy-to-treat conditions. This could lead to some hospitals
no longer offering a full range of services and ultimately having to close.
The worst-hit patients would include those
with chronic diseases such as obesity, diabetes and heart failure, Porter
added. They would have to travel longer distances for treatment.
The government is taking unnecessary risks by
imposing market measures on the NHS, as competitive healthcare cannot deliver
high quality treatment to everyone.
The NHS could become "a provider of
last resort" for patients whose illnesses are of no interest to
private firms, added Porter. Once independent providers have signed contracts
with the consortiums of GPs they could deny care to patients who would be
costly to treat, Porter warned.
"Like
blood, health care is too precious,
intimate and
corruptible to entrust
to the
market"
Guardian: Circle Health admits care may suffer.
NHS & Market Forces: Fund Holding & Medical Ethics
No comments:
Post a Comment