Jeffrey C Hall (L), Michael Rosbash (C), Michael W Young (R). (2013 AP file photo)
The
2017 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
Awarded jointly
to
Jeffrey C.
Hall, Michael Rosbash and Michael W. Young
for their discoveries
of molecular mechanisms controlling the circadian rhythm
This year’s prize, in
other words, is a kind of rebuke. Basic science is under siege, particularly in
the United States .
Congressional Luddites love to highlight federally funded projects that,
according to their own stunted definitions, pursue
meaningless questions that don’t readily translate into talking
points for a public that is intent on curing cancer or preventing Alzheimer’s
disease. It is possible that, in today’s political environment, Hall, Rosbash,
and Young would never have received money for their research. After all, do we
really need to know what makes a fruit fly tick?
But, as the Nobel
committee made clear this morning, the science that informs and occasionally
upends our understanding of human health and disease often comes from
unexpected places. Ohsumi used yeast cells to explore autophagy, but a similar
garbage-disposal system exists in you and me. Similarly, studies of the
circadian rhythm in flies have shed light on the genes and proteins that
synchronize our own bodies with the day; they may lead to treatments for a wide
range of maladies, from jet lag to obesity to heart disease. The joy of science
is to learn for learning’s sake; whatever wondrous insights emerge may then be
used to address the problems that we confront in our daily lives. The message
embedded in today’s Nobel Prize announcement couldn’t come at a better
moment—or a more fraught one.
No comments:
Post a Comment